A Comparative Analysis of Laravel Web Development Services with CodeIgniter and Symfony

Building a top-notch website or web application in least possible time is one of the toughest challenges that the web development industry faces today. This is the very reason which has given way to the use of PHP for web app development. Programmers prefer it for several reasons, like simplicity, robustness, and many frameworks to choose from. That is right; with PHP you have the option to choose a framework from a lot of good and popular frameworks. Although it is a great advantage to have multitude options, the negative side of it is that it also causes decision fatigue.

Three of the most popular frameworks of PHP are CodeIgniter, Symphony and Laravel, and in this post we are going to throw some light on Laravel web development services in comparison to Symphony and CodeIgniter. Our evalution of Laravel will be based on certain patterns viz. coding style, setup requirements and configuration, performance, modularity and usability, and the overall architecture.

Each of them has their own set of features, usage, merits, and demerits. Let’s now dig deeper to learn the differences between the three frameworks.

Laravel in Perspective with Symphony and CodeIgniter

Laravel has come into existence incorporating several Symfony components and hence leverages a great deal of it. While Laravel tries to maintain the style, it also keeps things simple by using stable and solid Symfony backbone to offer an entirely new way to code within its own MVC environment.

Laravel does a better job of enforcing some structure if we compare it with CodeIgniter. In addition, it leaves the architecture open for 3rd party plug-ins instead of following a more conservative plugin structure. While it’s much easier to re-use an existing component in most cases, relying entirely on third-party libraries can gradually cause you a maintenance troubles because of which larger Symfony projects can become cumbersome.

Laravel, as a front-end framework is the best to use since it does not require using complex data store functionality. When it comes to building a web application, Laravel developers get a convenient way to develop and implement API’s and to set up routing. In simple words, Laravel is the best interface when it comes to deal with a more complex back-end system.

Talking about testing, especially Unit testing in Laravel is a great convenience. It does not impose any strict guidelines for determining the right structure for your tests. It offers all the tools necessary to write effective unit and functional tests to give you exactly what you expect.

Why Choose Laravel?

Laravel, leveraging query builder mechanism allows developers to impose constraints when using multiple databases. Thus, you get an easy version control PHP Framework that simplifies the management of migrations.

Laravel with an auto-loading facility makes it easy for the developers to make efforts for inclusion paths and manual maintenance. It also gives the liberty to generate new tools using an IoC container.

With Laravel, authentication is much simpler because of the availability of ready-to-use pre-built authentication system. You only have to configure controllers, database migrations, models, and views to make your framework work.

Which framework should one go for? The answer: each of the frameworks has its own advantages and consequences. The choice of any framework depends on your set of needs. If ease of use and agile prototyping is your prime consideration, go with Laravel, but before you choose any framework, it is imperative to evaluate your set of requirements.

Article Source : http://www.rigelnetworks.com/comparative-analysis-laravel-web-development-services-codeigniter-symfony/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *